The Clarity Act failed a Senate vote; regulators take action and political money moves as Republicans weigh three concessions.
The Clarity Act, designed to divide cryptocurrency oversight between the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, fell short of the 60-vote cloture threshold in the Senate, and regulators are now scrambling to address the void.
The bill missed the required 60-vote mark for cloture, which would have allowed it to proceed to a final vote. The Clarity Act was intended to work alongside last year's Genius Act, which established initial federal rules for stablecoins backed by the dollar.
Democratic lawmakers raised no objections to the market structure provisions. However, they took issue with the bill's approach to policing conflicts of interest. Just hours before the vote, Republicans introduced a revised version of the Clarity Act that gave state attorneys general a role in enforcement, while federal enforcement remained under the Department of Justice.
The difference was significant. The Trump family earned $1.4 billion from crypto last year, leading many Democrats to argue that the ethics clause would not curb a president who oversees his own regulators.
This legislation failed squarely because Republicans refuse to say no to the president.
Senator Ruben Gallego, a Democrat from Arizona, made that argument in a statement to TheHill.
Community banks voiced a separate concern. Lobbyists warned that stablecoin interest payments allowed by the bill could draw deposits away from smaller institutions.
As Congress remains deadlocked, the SEC has created a route for trading tokenized stocks, while the CFTC has submitted a separate crypto rulemaking proposal to the White House. Neither action has the weight of law, making both vulnerable to legal challenges.
Political spending in the crypto industry is outpacing progress on ethics provisions. Fairshake, the leading super PAC in the sector, launched a $30 million campaign targeting Sherrod Brown.
Brown, a Democrat, is attempting to win back his former Ohio Senate seat, just one week after the Clarity Act's failure. The timing indicates that the industry is relying on midterm influence rather than expecting a rapid legislative solution.
Senator Thom Tillis changed his vote to preserve the possibility of revisiting the bill. The Senate will be in recess from October 5 until November 9, leaving only a narrow window before the current Congress concludes in early January.
To pass the Clarity Act within that timeframe, Republicans would probably have to make three concessions.
First, ethics enforcement that operates independently of the Department of Justice.
Second, a stricter prohibition on the president and his family holding crypto investments while in office.
Third, a stablecoin agreement that addresses the concerns of community banks.
Two of these three issues are already in the open. Gallego's comments highlighted the ethics disagreement, and the banking industry's objections brought the stablecoin issue to the fore.
Share to
Disclaimer: this article comes from third-party media and is provided for reference only. It does not constitute investment advice. Crypto and other financial products carry significant price volatility risk, so please make your own decisions carefully.
BTSE Bhutan has received a full Financial Services License from the GFSO, allowing it to offer regulated digital asset trading and custody in Gelephu…
The IRS issued a notice targeting crypto ETFs that use in-kind redemptions to avoid gains, and also shut down a tax-free stock swap for wealthy investors.
Belarus's first crypto banks are approved and will start operating once accredited by the National Bank.
Senate Democrats found 84% of sanctioned Iran-linked crypto wallets used Tether's USDT; Tether reported $550 million in related freezes.